Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Throwaway85 (talk | contribs) |
Phantomsteve (talk | contribs) Closing debate, result was delete |
||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. The main argument for keeping this article appears to be "someone has nominated a lot of articles for deletion", which as far as I am aware is not a valid reason for keeping ''this'' article. The sources provided have been refuted by the 'delete's as being authored by the creator of the language, and so not independent. The ones which are not written by him are disputed as useable as they are not about Y but about peephole optimisation. However, I would like to commend [[User:Throwaway 85|Throwaway 85]] for finding the sources, as I feel that this is more effective in argument than just saying "someone shouldn't nominate lots of articles for deletion', especially when at least one of those people used the precise-same-wording in their opposes for all of them! '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 01:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
===[[Y (programming language)]]===
:{{la|Y (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 February 12#{{anchorencode:Y (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 46 ⟶ 52:
:*Your comment is not very helpful. Could you please address the reasons for deletion instead of complaining about deletion sprees? --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 15:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:*Also note that Ubernostrum simply copy/pasted the same comment in all the nominations of programming languages that were made by monsanto. Throwaway85 has at least attempted to provide sources. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 15:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||