Content deleted Content added
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs) →Total rewrite in progress, November 2010: Restored version of 1 March 2011 |
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs) →Total rewrite in progress, November 2010: Re addition of Levy & Hubbard (2005) to main article. |
||
Line 70:
I have restored the previous version once again. The reasons are given above. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 10:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Further to the above, regarding Supyanhussin's criticisms of Levy's broad definition of CALL (which were added to the main article and then removed), see also Levy & Hubbard (2005), who raise the question ''Why call CALL “CALL”?'' A reference to Levy & Hubbard has now been added to the main article. Further discussion of what people understand by CALL might be useful but should be raised here before being added to the main article. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 11:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
|