Revision as of 11:03, 30 March 2011 edit JidGom (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,794 edits that table! ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:25, 12 January 2012 edit undo 91.206.174.166 (talk) Added a comment regarding RIPEMD vs RIPEMD-160. Next edit →
Line 11: Putting attack on the complete algorithm and attack on reduced rounds versions in the same table is completely unreadable, mixing practical weaknesses and irrelevant to practical security ones... From a causality point of view - RIPEMD can not be derived from RIPEMD-160, since the latter was in fact developed after the first.

Talk:Comparison of cryptographic hash functions: Difference between revisions