Talk:Comparison of Java and C++: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:44, 1 April 2011

Revision as of 19:57, 1 April 2011

Line 198:

:[[User:ngong1|ngong1]]

:I mean this a central point in comparison: [[Productivity]], and it's missing about completely. What language is easier to teach to an "average programmer" (what's that)? What language is "more fun", thus enhancing productivity (how to measure fun)? What language needs less tests per [[Function point]]? What language leads to fewer errors in an application after going operational (I heard of 10:1 C++:Java in no of errors, but did not find any source, yet)? Where are the PHD thesis's investigating these subjects? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.93.158.26|192.93.158.26]] ([[User talk:192.93.158.26|talk]]) 14:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:: I work in PHP and I hate it. I hate Java also. For me, personally, C/C++ is the funniest. And it allows full control for everything. Go those who support Java, I would suggest to look for some algorithm & data structure theory. Java does not allow to efficiently manipulate the algorithmical complexity of a program. Also, the "hardcore" programming is done in C/C++.

[[User:Jayaram ganapathy|Jayaram Ganapathy]]