Revision as of 04:10, 5 March 2006 edit Deckiller (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 33,260 edits m new strategy: template at the top ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:11, 5 March 2006 edit undo Deckiller (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 33,260 edits →Article assessment: reply Next edit →
Line 130: This features defenitely would be a fun part of this project to add. If we were to do it, I think it should work like this: We pick couple articles a day (SW related) and as a community read them over. We make a peer review for the page of all the things than can be improved and vote on a score. [[User:Tutmosis\|Tutmosis]] 00:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC) :I agree with peer reviews. We don't have to have them on a timetable, we can just flag them. A good process is to: #SW peer review #Fix article up based on the review #Place the article on the index/flag it as a project article #Hold a Wikipedia Peer Review #Fix article up based on the review #Flag it as a [[WP:GA\|Good article]] #Any final checks #Send it into FA. == New article ==

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Wars: Difference between revisions