Revision as of 17:56, 10 April 2011 edit Greg L (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 31,898 edits →RfC on the use of “tibibytes”: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:22, 10 April 2011 edit undo Greg L (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 31,898 edits →RfC on the use of “tibibytes”: revise section title to one of my own choosing and which speaks squarely to the issue as this is my post Next edit →
Line 54: Members of this WikiProject may be particularly qualified/interested in weighing in on these AfDs. --[[User:Cybercobra\|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra\|(talk)]] 00:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC) == RfC on the use of ~~“tibibytes”~~terminology like “[[GiB]]” (gibibyte) on Wikipedia == '''Notice:''' An RFC is being conducted here at '''[[Talk:Hard_disk_drive#RFC_on_the_use_of_the_IEC_prefixes\|Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes]]'''. The debate under consideration is the use in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hard_disk_drive&oldid=423180773#Capacity this table] of the “[[Hard disk drive]]” article of nomenclature such as “KiB”, “MiB”, and “GiB” to describe capacities. The governing guideline on MOSNUM is [[Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Quantities_of_bytes_and_bits\|Quantities of bytes and bits]]. The quality of the discussion can be improved by broadening participation of the discussion. This will hopefully more fully achieve a consensus. [[User:Greg L\|Greg L]] ([[User talk:Greg L\|talk]]) 17:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Programming languages: Difference between revisions