Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny programming languages: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Tiny programming languages]]: redirect |
r |
||
Line 2:
This article has been a stub for almost a year and nobody has done anything with it. As currently written, it's pretty much of a disaster. Perhaps it should just be redirected to [[Domain-specific programming language]]? -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 13:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', there will be someday when a user expands stubs. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 13:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': Is "tiny programming language" an established compsci term? <s>If it's not, I vote delete as [[WP:OR]]/defining a new term.</s> --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:*No, it's not an established term. '''Delete''' as neologism. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 15:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
::*Thanks for clearing that up. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Domain-specific programming language]]. The article is unverifiable original research made up in school after the first class of Compiler Construction 101. I doubt the described language exists or has a chance of existing other than as a joke. [[Little language]]s do exist and there is an article about those. [[User:Weregerbil|Weregerbil]] 15:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' per Weregerbil. -- [[User:Alpha269|Alpha269]] 15:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Domain-specific programming language]] per above. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
|