Revision as of 20:27, 28 April 2011 edit Mmeijeri (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,533 edits →Better wording for potential drawback: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:29, 15 August 2011 edit undo Jojalozzo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,627 edits →Is Extreme Programming a proper name?: new section Next edit →
Line 89: From an XP perspective the above criticism is unfounded, something that isn't apparent from the way the statement is worded right now. Replacing the word potential with alleged would solve this, but that sounds too biased. Any suggestions? [[User:Mmeijeri\|Martijn Meijering]] ([[User talk:Mmeijeri\|talk]]) 20:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC) == Is Extreme Programming a proper name? == I think "extreme programming" is not a proper name and therefore should not be capitalized. I know it is accepted practice in the industry to capitalize terms but in Wikipedia capitalization is used only for proper names. There is a general policy discussion about capitalizing names for engineering ideas and concepts at the [[WP:VPP#When are names for technical methods and systems proper names and when are they not?\|village pump]] and I encourage participation by those who contribute here. <font color="#500000">[[User:Jojalozzo\|Joja]]</font><font color="#005000">[[User talk:Jojalozzo\|lozzo]]</font> 16:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Extreme programming: Difference between revisions