Content deleted Content added
Thomea neuro (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 62:
Tryptofish, I think that a better solution would be to add here what is specific in each case for neural coding and let their pages unchanged since all seem to add different relevant details that cannot be included here. In case of [[NeuroElectroDynamics]] specific for coding and decoding information would be: "The coding phase includes changes in spatial rearrangement of electrical charges in macromolecular complexes of neurons, determined by selective gene expression, conformational changes in proteins, polarizations. The decoding phase can be related to alterations in transient charge density dynamics"
If you agree I can add. Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Goodwillein|Goodwillein]] ([[User talk:Goodwillein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Goodwillein|contribs]]) 15:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Concerning Looie496 position regarding neuroscience labs ( including Graybiel's lab) we should see the difference between experimental data processing and computational theoretical models. Few neuroscience labs have generated new computational theories! Importantly, good statistics on a wrong model (temporal coding model) does not make the science better doesn’t matter where is published. Experimentally, we are at the beginning of understanding the effect of electric field (endogenous field, ephaptic coupling) in computation. Regarding the second subject neural coding and NED are not equivalent, temporal coding models can be derived as particular examples of NED with no real predictive power, semantics or significance.[[User:Giovannistefano35|Giovannistefano35]] ([[User Giovannistefano35:Giovannistefano35|talk]])
| |||