Revision as of 07:12, 9 June 2011 edit Fifelfoo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,802 edits →No, retain the old policy ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:47, 9 June 2011 edit undo Timotheus Canens (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 38,586 edits →Yes, adopt the new updated policy: +1 Next edit →
Line 260: # Given the way it's structured, I am unconvinced that the Arbitration Committee ''can'' make a real difference. But it can make incremental improvements, which this is. [[User:Cool Hand Luke\|Cool Hand]] ''[[User talk:Cool Hand Luke\|Luke]]'' 14:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC) # Improvement over current policy. [[User:Heimstern\|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern\|(talk)]] 14:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC) # Good enough for government work. [[User:Timotheus Canens\|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens\|talk]]) 12:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC) ==No, retain the old policy==

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update and ratification: Difference between revisions