Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update and ratification: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→No, retain the old policy: original ratification by community |
|||
Line 360:
#::There appear to have been but 19 supports when Sandstein raised his objection. I wish there had been a pause and correction then, before the next 100 supports came in. I know it's a pain, but the amount of effort already invested + the importance of Arbitration Policy, imo make it worth fixing before adopting. [[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] ([[User talk:Jd2718|talk]]) 02:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
#:::Shame that the policy wasn't made by the community, or else we might not have this problem. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]]<small> ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|Talk]])</small> 02:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
#::::[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_policy_ratification_vote|Original ratification by the community]]. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 03:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
|