Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny programming languages: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Closing debate; result was delete
WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs)
m Fix misnested tag lint errors
Line 9:
This article has been a stub for almost a year and nobody has done anything with it. As currently written, it's pretty much of a disaster. <s>Perhaps it should just be redirected to [[Domain-specific programming language]]?</s> -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 13:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:When I first proposed this, I wasn't sure if delete or redirect made more sense. Based on the discussion, I've come to the conclusion that '''Delete''' is the right thing. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 17:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', there will be someday when a user expands stubs. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green">e]]</fontspan>]][[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 13:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': Is "tiny programming language" an established compsci term? <s>If it's not, I vote delete as [[WP:OR]]/defining a new term.</s> --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:*No, it's not an established term. '''Delete''' as neologism. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 15:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 30:
 
 
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>