Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Perl: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Learning Perl: article expanded |
|||
Line 24:
:::::::That's some mighty thin skin there, when I was simply trying to AGF about your motivations in nominating such a book for deletion. I do think you are either prone to hyperbole or you have a very... ''unique'' view of what constitutes a personal attack. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 02:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
::Note that at this point I've edited the article to add 8 separate RS references, demonstrating pretty conclusively that the book meets the [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 03:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Only the [http://books.google.com/books?id=jlIEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA75&dq=%22Learning+Perl%22+schwartz&hl=en&ei=svQDTpmeF5PksQOI-4TNDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&sqi=2&ved=0CGEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22Learning%20Perl%22%20schwartz&f=false Morrey] and [http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3372 Rooijackers] reviews actually count towards establishing notability (the rest being either minor mentions or irrelevant comment about the author) but it does only take two [[WP:RS]] and you have them. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 12:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||