Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Statement by Russavia: some minor changes |
→Statement by Habap: how about while you are topic-banned, edit something no one will argue with you about? |
||
Line 213:
Please, edit something that has nothing to do with WWII or the evils of capitalism for the next six months so that you can find out what it is like to edit something without raging against the institutional bias. At the end of your topic-ban, feel free to re-engage in the controversial topics and work to remove the bias. This is what you're supposed to do when you are topic-banned, not spend days or weeks arguing about what the ban was about and whether it was justified. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] ([[User talk:Habap|talk]]) 19:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
:Communikat, I did not state that your ''work focuses only on "the evils of capitalism"'', merely that it would be wise for you to avoid issues that inspire you to complain about ''Nobody admitting openly that the only contributions not objected to in the field of 20th Century military history are those that derive from the '''capitalist mode of information production'''.''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification&action=historysubmit&diff=436729015&oldid=436724266] You seem not to be hearing the point, which is, for the next six months, while you are topic-banned, edit something no one will argue with you about. Once you've done that, come back to such articles with better habits. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] ([[User talk:Habap|talk]]) 18:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
=== Statement by Timotheus Canens ===
| |||