Revision as of 17:33, 30 June 2011 edit Chaos5023 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,687 edits m fix obnoxious relist template flummery ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:35, 30 June 2011 edit undo Chaos5023 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,687 edits expand slightly Next edit →
Line 35: :::::What does that have to do with anything? "Notable" doesn't mean [[WP:ILIKEIT\|"I think it's important"]], it means [[WP:GNG\|"has significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources"]]. [[User:Chaos5023\|—chaos5023]] ([[User talk:Chaos5023\|talk]]) 15:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC) ::::::What "significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources"?? The article has references to two obscure publications (yea, I get ''Network Computing'', too, and so can anyone else who has an email address), and you listed a collection of blog posts that from the publisher's web site (but thankfully didn't include that as a reference, since it doesn't qualify). Big deal! Between the two of us, we have written about as much about this book as your "multiple independent reliable sources" have. Remember from GNG, "''self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, and press releases are not considered independent''". I know you think this is a cool book, but there isn't much else to justify keeping it. I am trying to [[WP:AGF\|assume good faith]], but what is your great concern with keeping this obscure little book from being deleted? --[[User:Rogerd\|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd\|talk]]) 17:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC) *:::::::I give up. You can review [[WP:RS]] for what a reliable source is and why your personal belief that a publication is "obscure" doesn't relate to it, and I'll note that "oh gosh I really want to AGF but I just can''not'' imagine that you would argue the way you're doing without a hidden COI" is not what success at AGF looks like. Beyond that, I'm done. If the article gets deleted because of this nonsense, it'll be trivial to get it back at DRV. [[User:Chaos5023\|—chaos5023]] ([[User talk:Chaos5023\|talk]]) 17:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC) <hr style="width:55%;" /> :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Perl Programming: Difference between revisions