Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Statement by Habap: ah, right, it is indefinite, though it is eligible for change soon |
m →Statement by Habap: signed |
||
Line 228:
:Communikat, I did not state that your ''work focuses only on "the evils of capitalism"'', merely that it would be wise for you to avoid issues that inspire you to complain about ''Nobody admitting openly that the only contributions not objected to in the field of 20th Century military history are those that derive from the '''capitalist mode of information production'''.''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification&action=historysubmit&diff=436729015&oldid=436724266] You seem not to be hearing the point, which is, for the next six months, while you are topic-banned, edit something no one will argue with you about. Once you've done that, come back to such articles with better habits. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] ([[User talk:Habap|talk]]) 18:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
::Ah, you are right. My mistake. I thought it was only a year, but that was the behaviour restriction. Of course, if you started to exhibit good behaviour, the topic-ban could be terminated or modified. In fact, it could be changed in a couple of weeks if you requested and they agreed. So, my advice stands. Learn to edit using articles on which you are unlikely to encounter arguments before editing those on which the possibility exists. Surely you have other interests? Sports teams that you follow? Beverages you enjoy drinking? Hobbies? If you edit in such articles, you might have a less contentious experience. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] ([[User talk:Habap|talk]]) 15:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
=== Statement by Timotheus Canens ===
| |||