Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 82.21.217.6 - "→Controversy: " |
|||
Line 129:
There is currently a lot of heated talk about ORM as an anti pattern due to incorrect abstraction and inefficiency. Right or wrong and I feel some of this controversy should be mentioned. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=orm+anti%3Dpattern#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&source=hp&q=orm+anti+pattern&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=ce07ae90aca13e82&biw=1440&bih=675] [http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2657745]
"An alternative to implementing ORM is use of the native procedural languages provided with every major database on the market. " - This should be removed, it is not one of the main alternatives when discussing ORM alternatives. [http://www.mehdi-khalili.com//orm-anti-patterns-series] [http://dumaslab.com/2011/06/orm-is-an-anti-pattern/] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.21.217.6|82.21.217.6]] ([[User talk:82.21.217.6|talk]]) 07:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|