Content deleted Content added
Delphi / FPC / Object Pascal heading and links. Inconsistent Woof! Woof! vs Arf! Arf! examples. Removed unknown reference to "DEEP". |
|||
Line 137:
I could go on.. But it would be nice if someone would clarify these things before I go any further (I feel that I am already speculating too much about the intention of the author). In summary, a little more precision would help.
[[User:Szepi|Szepi]] ([[User talk:Szepi|talk]]) 04:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
==Bad article... Bad article!==
This is a classic example of a lousy encyclopedia article. It's written in a stiff academic style that even [[Lilith Sternin]] would disapprove of. Worse, the author has no idea of how to organize and present the material to make it accessible and interesting. "Accessible and interesting" ''does not'' equate to "simplistic" or "inaccurate". One of the marks of a good writer is the ability to present complex material ''without'' watering it down (''qv'', [[Richard Feynman]]).
In short... it's BOR...ing. I quit after the first two paragraphs. It needs not only a complete rewrite, but a complete re-conceptualization. [[User:WilliamSommerwerck|WilliamSommerwerck]] ([[User talk:WilliamSommerwerck|talk]]) 19:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
| |||