Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Questions for the candidate: second answer |
MOAR RAINBOWS! |
||
Line 106:
#'''Support''' Why not? --[[User:Bsadowski1|Bsa]][[User talk:Bsadowski1|dow]][[Special:Contributions/Bsadowski1|ski1]] 09:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No problems here. (I do like peanut butter and jam sandwiches, but we don't seem to have marshmallow creme over here so I can't sample a fluffermutter...) [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 11:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#
#'''Of course''', intelligent, reasonable, able to remain calm in heated situations, knows her way around the 'pedia...I can only wonder why she never ran for adminship sooner! [[user:OohBunnies!|<sup><small><font color="#8C0099">Ooh</font></small></sup><font color="#F166FF">Bunnies!</font>]]<small><span style="color:#A62428">[[user_talk:OohBunnies!|Not just any bunnies...]]</span></small> 13:34, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Without hesitation. My main reasons may be somewhat different from other people's, in that I don;t particularly indulge in edit-counting, or numbers of GA's, FA's, and so on. We need all sorts, and we need trustworthy allsorts, and the allsorts working in lower-profile areas need mops for those areas, too. I particularly like the way FLuffernutter interacts with others; not afraid to tell it how it is, but in an inherently clueful, reasoned, rational and non-confrontational kind of way. When I stalk contribs (watch out, y'all - I admitted to being a stalker!) I focus on people's interactions with each other. It helps me know them better. I've yet to see anything in this background which would give me any distrust in Fluffernutter's ability to wield the mop. [[User:ThatPeskyCommoner| <span style="color:#003300; font-family: cursive;">'''Pesky'''</span>]] ([[User talk:ThatPeskyCommoner|<span style="color:#336600;">talk</span>]] …[[Special:Contributions/ThatPeskyCommoner|''stalk!'']]) 13:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
|