Content deleted Content added
Line 155:
'''SlothMcCarty''' that is very well put. However, there exists some "core" libraries or types for both languages which could be considered part of the language. Some are even mentioned in the respective language specs. My feeling is that these should be allowed in regardless of specific syntactical support. For instance, the ''class'' type of Java and the ''Type'' type of C#. As I see it, using the criteria you suggested, we should get rid of the "platforms" table as well as the collections among others. I would suggest a criteria for the rest: Good explanation contrasting the languages should follow each table section. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 19:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
== Edit ==
| |||