Revision as of 01:02, 26 August 2011 edit 123.200.203.23 (talk) →Operators in other languages ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:14, 30 August 2011 edit undo 1exec1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,085 edits →Separate C and C++?: reply Next edit →
Line 44: :: Right, that's why it says "no" under "in C?" --[[User:131.215.155.112\|131.215.155.112]] 22:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC) : I agree, let's have different articles. Currently the article is quite a mess since C doesn't have the concept of operator overloading. If the article was split, both ''Overloadable'' and ''Prototype examples'' columns could be not included in the article about operators in C and we won't need ''Included in C'' column at all. If we had separate articles, it would be possible to better present the details of operators in each C and C++.[[User:1exec1\|1exec1]] ([[User talk:1exec1\|talk]]) 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC) ==order of operations==

Talk:Operators in C and C++: Difference between revisions