Revision as of 15:40, 19 September 2011 edit MrOllie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 255,762 edits m gr ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:10, 19 September 2011 edit undo Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software Next edit →
Line 5: :({{Find sources\|Serenity Code Coverage}}) I PROD'd this article for being unsourced. In response, the author of the article / developer of this software added a link to his website, and to a book description page on Barnes and Noble and removed the prod template. The page on Barnes and Noble says 'Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online.' - so this cannot be a reliable source. I've looked, and I can't find any independent reliable sources. I believe this article fails the [[WP:GNG\|general notability guideline]]. [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 15:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 16:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenity Code Coverage: Difference between revisions