Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Courcelles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments: support |
→Comments: comment |
||
Line 53:
*Courcelles is a well seasoned member of the AUSC and I would fully support for turning in the audit flag (or keeping it for that matter) for the CU flag. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> 17:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
*Courcelles strikes me as both neutral and transparent in their actions. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
*I have a generally favorable impression of Courcelles' judgment in his current roles. If he wants to continue doing CU and Oversight work after rotating off the audit committee, that should be beneficial to Wikipedia. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 02:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||