Revision as of 23:08, 25 October 2011 edit 1exec1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,085 edits →JIT vs. non-JIT vs. semantics: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:16, 27 October 2011 edit undo Chronodm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 621 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 217: [[User:Alliumnsk\|Alliumnsk]] ([[User talk:Alliumnsk\|talk]]) :: The fact that Java hides pointer semantics from the programmer means nothing about the underlying architecture. Actually, ''every'' object in Java is a pointer, wrapped in a shiny name "reference", except for the primitives.[[User:1exec1\|1exec1]] ([[User talk:1exec1\|talk]]) 23:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC) == "In programming contests" section == The references in this section seem to be broken and/or 5+ years old; they also look to be primary. Anyone have better ones? If not, I suggest deletion. [[User:Chronodm\|Chronodm]] ([[User talk:Chronodm\|talk]]) 22:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Java performance: Difference between revisions