Content deleted Content added
Line 481:
[[User:Ansgaard|Ansgaard]] ([[User talk:Ansgaard|talk]]) 12:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
:Much of the discussion above is pretty funny in a weird kind of way - I find this symptomatic in software kind of articles on Wikipedia, I got some blatant lie reinserted some time ago for the reason that a subclause in my change note could be interpreted in the wrong way - other articles that are notoriously usually unreliable and [[WP:OR]] and unduly [[WP:SYNTH]]etic are religious and nationality articles. If you feel for it, remove Smalltalk, it's certainly from someones imagination, and if you're lucky, you won't be attacked from an ignorant moron. [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: #FFFF80"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 19:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
== Nice link ==
| |||