Talk:Java performance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Alliumnsk (talk | contribs)
Line 222:
The references in this section seem to be broken and/or 5+ years old; they also look to be primary. Anyone have better ones? If not, I suggest deletion. [[User:Chronodm|Chronodm]] ([[User talk:Chronodm|talk]]) 22:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
: I agree: unless we find a source that states that "we give problem solutions in Java more/less time since Java is slower/faster", we should not include any information about these contests. [[User:1exec1|1exec1]] ([[User talk:1exec1|talk]]) 20:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
:: For lazy people: 3rd ref:<p>
::''Concretely speaking, Java programs are allowed to run for THREE TIMES the time limit and are given another 150MS for each input file out of consideration for I/O efficiency. ''<p>
::4rd ref:<p>
::''7. Since Java program runs slow, The time limit of each problem will be about twice of the original, and the memory limit is enlarged to 1024M. Notice it may not enough for some problems.''
: I suggest you to read the references first. Dates: The first one, says ''This entry was posted by connect4 on Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 at 12:40 pm. '' at its bottom. In the second one, if you happen to get through first sentence, you can see date February, 2 2009, which indicates the source is newer that that, which doesn't fit into "5+ years" you mentioned. Now, would you delete links to Dr.Dobbs which are 6 years old? [[User:Alliumnsk|Alliumnsk]] ([[User talk:Alliumnsk|talk]]) 06:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)