Revision as of 02:23, 6 November 2011 edit 116.20.66.153 (talk) →Valid topic: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:24, 6 November 2011 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,694 edits m Signing comment by 116.20.66.153 - "→Valid topic: new section" Next edit →
Line 20: Too much teaching is focused on "theory" and not enough on application. This has been discussed extensively but here is an interesting and recent article about it referring to the research: [http://mindhacks.com/2011/10/24/make-study-more-effective-the-easy-way/ Make study more effective, the easy way] This is also why Dogme does not belong here. The greatest distinction of Dogme is that they are against using course books. In Dogme, a task or no task are just as valid. Sitting around and talking about shoes is just as valid as trying to achieve a task. I agree with the other poster, reasons for the Dogme reference are dubious. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/116.20.66.153\|116.20.66.153]] ([[User talk:116.20.66.153\|talk]]) 02:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Task-based language teaching: Difference between revisions