Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tool Integration Language (TIL): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:38, 6 November 2011

Revision as of 02:28, 15 November 2011

Line 2:

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}

:{{la|Tool Integration Language (TIL)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tool Integration Language (TIL)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 615#{{anchorencode:Tool Integration Language (TIL)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

:({{Find sources|Tool Integration Language (TIL)}})

Very specialised modelling language. Article was deleted once for lack of notability. The reference now added does little to improve the situation. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC) &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Line 8:

* '''Delete''' Does not meet general notability. Single-purpose account and conflict of interest potential. Seems the usual sad case of a poor new user not being familiar with guidelines. Article created on the first edit of [[Special:Contributions/Mattbiehl|Mattbiehl]], who has only made edits on this article and one talking about it. The first author of the one reference is Matthias Biehl. Clearly the title does not comply with conventions (the trailing acronym in parens). An article on [[tool integration language]] might stand a better chance of survival. That is, an article on the general topic as indicated by the lower case title. It could, for example, cite the [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=664351 paper here] from 20 years ago on the subject, and give others up to and including the 2011 one on similar subjects. We generally do not consider subjects of a single student paper as notable, but wait until at least one other independent source at least mentions it. Perhaps userfy if the editor is willing to come up to speed with policy? [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 18:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

<hr style="width:55%;" />