Revision as of 06:36, 22 November 2011 edit Comps (talk \| contribs) 4,217 edits →Tag: "The neutrality of this article is disputed" for the section Tree two-phase commit protocol ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:17, 12 December 2011 edit undo Repairman2011 (talk \| contribs) 8 edits →Tag: "The neutrality of this article is disputed" for the section Tree two-phase commit protocol: Remove mistaken tag Next edit →
Line 103: [[User:Ruud Koot]], you have been so eager to put the tag, like in other four articles that mention [[Commitment ordering]] (specifically, [[Concurrency control]], [[Distributed concurrency control]], [[Serializability]], [[Global serializability]]), that you have put this tag here for ''Commitment ordering'' (see tag in article; visible at edit mode) and you have not even noticed that Commitment ordering ''is not mentioned here at all!'' So I guess this is not an attack just on Commitment ordering but rather on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]] (you took an active part in deleting the Wikipedia article [[Yoav Raz]]). Have you read the tagged section at all? Again, I wonder what bias you see here, and why you put a tag for Commitment ordering that is not relevant here. You also have not explained what bias you see in the other four articles. --[[User:Comps\|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps\|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC) [[User:Ruud Koot]], note that the entire description of your tagged section appears in the text-book reference [[Weikum and Vossen 2001]] which explicitly and completely relies on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]]'s article (which is also referenced here). Do you also accuse Weikum and Vossen with bias? This time this is obviously ridiculous. --[[User:Comps\|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps\|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Tag for [[Commitment ordering]] in this article is clearly misplaced and should be removed. [[User:Repairman2011\|Repairman2011]] ([[User talk:Repairman2011\|talk]]) 08:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Two-phase commit protocol: Difference between revisions