Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogramming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
re
Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
*'''Weak delete''' per [[WP:NOR]]. I thought this was a well-referenced dictionary definition with the slightest bit of encyclopedic content. Then I started checking the content of the sources, and discovered they didn't back up the assertions in the article. While I'd be inclined to forgive the brief secondary-source coverage of the word if there were well-referenced encyclopedic content in the article, too much of it is [[WP:OR|original research]] sprinkled with somewhat-related citations. --[[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 00:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
**I have tightened up the wording to be closer to the sources, I would appreciate reconsideration. [[User:Jorgenev|<font face="Lucida Console" color="black" size="1">'''JORGENEV'''</font>]] 08:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
* Additional '''comment''' by nominator: the article is kind of unclear on what brogramming actually is — it's a word and its definition is given, but the first sentence says it's a meme and the article doesn't explain what makes it a meme. If it is indeed a notable meme then it ''might'' belong in Wikipedia, but as simply a neologism I don't think it does. What exactly is the meme here? Translating things into brospeak? Is it a notable internet meme? Does it belong in the article called "brogramming"? —&nbsp;[[User:Jean Calleo|Jean&nbsp;Calleo]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jean Calleo|talk]])</sup> 02:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)