Revision as of 13:56, 23 November 2011 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,659 edits m Signing comment by 195.244.120.156 - "→Move discussion in progress: " ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:28, 23 November 2011 edit undo 1exec1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,085 edits re Next edit →
Line 12: ==Move discussion in progress== There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at [[Talk:C standard library#Move request through WP:RM\|Talk:C standard library - Requested move]] and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:C standard library crosspost --> —[[User:RM bot\|RM bot]] 09:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC) ==time_t== Regarding the "time_t - time since epoch type". Line 18 ⟶ 20: Thus, it should be "time_t - time since epoch type for most compilers such as gcc"! (see http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/glibc-2.2.3/html_chapter/libc_21.html) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.244.120.156\|195.244.120.156]] ([[User talk:195.244.120.156\|talk]]) 13:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> : I don't understand what was wrong with the previous statement. <code>time_t</code> means ''"time since epoch"'' or ''"calendar time"'' in all contexts as per specification. The thing that is undefined is the format of that type, not what it represents. Thus since the the previous definition doesn't specify anything about the format, it's still correct. [[User:1exec1\|1exec1]] ([[User talk:1exec1\|talk]]) 16:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk:C date and time functions: Difference between revisions