Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogramming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:56, 23 November 2011

Revision as of 18:42, 23 November 2011

Line 10:

**I have tightened up the wording to be closer to the sources, I would appreciate reconsideration. [[User:Jorgenev|<font face="Lucida Console" color="black" size="1">'''JORGENEV'''</font>]] 08:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

* Additional '''comment''' by nominator: the article is kind of unclear on what brogramming actually is — it's a word and its definition is given, but the first sentence says it's a meme and the article doesn't explain what makes it a meme. If it is indeed a notable meme then it ''might'' belong in Wikipedia, but as simply a neologism I don't think it does. What exactly is the meme here? Translating things into brospeak? Is it a notable internet meme? Does it belong in the article called "brogramming"? —&nbsp;[[User:Jean Calleo|Jean&nbsp;Calleo]]&nbsp;^{([[User talk:Jean Calleo|talk]])} 02:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

** The article has been edited but my concern wasn't addressed. It appears that one of the topics, either the word or the meme (if it is indeed a meme), is trying to inherit notability from the other. I added a tag because the article is unclear on what the subject actually is. —&nbsp;[[User:Jean Calleo|Jean&nbsp;Calleo]]&nbsp;^{([[User talk:Jean Calleo|talk]])} 18:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 15:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)