Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2011/November: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 462718994 by Severo (talk) should actually read what page i am on
Basque stubs: Brittany, Galicia etc
Line 9:
:... which encompasses another country with a border running through it. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] ([[User talk:Mais oui!|talk]]) 10:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
::Point of information, I have identified approx 700 Basque-related article stubs that are neither geographical nor biographical (the 2 subcats), and I haven't really been trying all that hard. I'd geusstimate that there are up to 2000 stub articles to be sorted into the main cat, and hundreds more to be sorted into the 2 subcats. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] ([[User talk:Mais oui!|talk]]) 11:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
As we already have all of these:
* Asturias stubs‎ (1 C, 83 P)
* Balearic Islands stubs‎ (113 P)
* Brittany stubs‎ (1 C, 37 P)
* Canary Islands stubs‎ (1 C, 62 P)
* Cantabria stubs‎ (96 P)
* Catalonia stubs‎ (3 C, 329 P)
* Galicia stubs‎ (1 C, 135 P)
* Plazas de soberanía stubs‎ (60 P)
* Valencia stubs‎ (58 P)
... the omission of the Basque Country was fairly shocking. In fact, for someone used to editing Scottish, English and Irish articles, I have to say that the Spanish category system (including stubs) is pretty dire. A direness only exceeded by the poor quality of many articles and the thousands of redlinks. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] ([[User talk:Mais oui!|talk]]) 11:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)