Talk:Code refactoring: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
subcategorize WP to sw
Grshiplett (talk | contribs)
Line 128:
 
I could go on but suffice it to say this article is very misleading. There is really no substitute for good programming and part of that is understanding the code that is being written in its context (so that when something doesn't work, you find out why, not try something new). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.142.127.235|86.142.127.235]] ([[User talk:86.142.127.235|talk]]) 08:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== why is the refactoring browser "so-called" ? ==
 
Which tool is older than the Refactoring Browser for VW Smalltalk from http://www.refactory.com/tools/refactoring-browser ?
 
A tool in VA Smalltalk ? But that team wrote eclipse ... was there one in IBM workbench ? Was there one in the Borland C++ IDE for OS/2 ?
 
Which Object Pascal had such a tool ?
 
But it is "so-called" ... because an EDITOR is not a REFACTORING tool any more than the bogey under an aircraft is an airfoil. The bogies add drag, not lift. And eclipse ?
 
G. Robert Shiplett 21:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)