|
Once again I am astounded that I can find definitions and relationships of and between Microsoft technologies that are absent (or present who knows where mixed in with who knows what) from Microsoft's own downscale, deprecated, paper and ink documentation. Yay, Wikipedia.
:Wikipedia is open to everybody to contribute. Please feel free to do so. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|Szvest]] 18:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)'' {{User:FayssalF/Sign}}
== merge [[ASP master pages]] into this article ==
[[ASP master pages]] should be merged into this article -- [[User:timdew|timdew]] ([[User talk:timdew|<sup>Talk</sup>]]) 13:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
:'''Strong Disagree''' Are you crazy? Master pages are ''a part'' of ASP.NET, but hardly the same thing. In fact, many, probably most, ASP.NET developers never use master pages. ( That seems enough of a reason to keep the articles sperated! ) This suggestion is a lot like the idea of merging the articles on USA and Wyoming - B is a part of A, but A is '''not''' B. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:DigitalEnthusiast|DigitalEnthusiast]] ([[User talk:DigitalEnthusiast|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DigitalEnthusiast|contribs]]) 18:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
:: you made my point and never realised, that "... many, probably most, ASP.NET developers never use ASP master pages" and therefore ASP master pages doesn't warrant a page of it's own. please try not to be rude in your reply, i'm not crazy. -- [[User:timdew|timdew]] ([[User talk:timdew|<sup>Talk</sup>]]) 19:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
:::Sorry if that sounded rude - wasn't my intent. I just don't think "strongly disagree" conveyed my feelings strongly enough. While I see your point that master pages could be notable enough to mention but not for their own article, there are any number of developers who ''do'' use them ( myself included ). To many it's as if "master pages" didn't exist, even aren't a part of ASP.NET, however, they '''are''' a subset, and only of version 2.0, so I really think it makes sense to keep the two articles seperate. Also, I'm rewriting much of the ASP.NET page, and while I'm removing some content ( that's either confusing, or simply untrue ) it will be longer when I'm finished. If necessary, I'll do the same for the Master Pages article, and point out a lot of the specific issues their use brings up. ( ''PS - Obviously you're not crazy if you can understand this highly technical stuff.'' ) [[User:DigitalEnthusiast|DigitalEnthusiast]] 20:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
::I also disagree with the merge suggestion [[ASP master pages]] are a large enough part of [[ASP.NET]] that it does indeed warrant a separate article. That said, the current article needs to be significantly expanded. I will try to work on it, but no guarantees! (P.S. - Thank you, [[User:DigitalEnthusiast|DigitalEnthusiast]], for your contributions; I am new to Wikipedia and appreciate your corrections to my recent updates) --[[User:Jimmytharpe|Jimmytharpe]] 17:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
:'''Strong Disagree'''. Master pages are a very important part of ASP.NET, there's a whole lot to be said about them (as you can see in this page), and they're a recent development, as opposed to a feature that always has been native to ASP.NET. [[User:Thomasmallen|Thomasmallen]] 15:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
<font color>red riya</font color>
:'''Disagree''' I agree that master pages are a part of ASP.NET, but they existed through 2 releases (1.0 and 1.1) without being implemented. Master pages are an important concept in and of themselves. The concept of template-based web-programming was changed from a simple server-side include model to an object oriented approach. //[[User:BankingBum|BankingBum]] 06:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC) [[User talk:BankingBum|<font color=darkgreen><sup>$$</sup></font>]]
:'''Disagree''' For reasons cited above, and because they're only part of ASP.NET 2.0, not all versions. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/68.144.124.143|68.144.124.143]] ([[User talk:68.144.124.143|talk]]) 16:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
== "Unhandled exceptions force the ASP.NET worker processes to shut down" ==
| 