Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Repairman2011 (talk) to last version by Comps |
|||
Line 103:
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], you have been so eager to put the tag, like in other four articles that mention [[Commitment ordering]] (specifically, [[Concurrency control]], [[Distributed concurrency control]], [[Serializability]], [[Global serializability]]), that you have put this tag here for ''Commitment ordering'' (see tag in article; visible at edit mode) and you have not even noticed that Commitment ordering ''is not mentioned here at all!'' So I guess this is not an attack just on Commitment ordering but rather on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]] (you took an active part in deleting the Wikipedia article [[Yoav Raz]]). Have you read the tagged section at all? Again, I wonder what bias you see here, and why you put a tag for Commitment ordering that is not relevant here. You also have not explained what bias you see in the other four articles. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], note that the entire description of your tagged section appears in the text-book reference [[Weikum and Vossen 2001]] which explicitly and completely relies on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]]'s article (which is also referenced here). Do you also accuse Weikum and Vossen with bias? This time this is obviously ridiculous. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
::Section does not present any views but rather facts. Not even connected to [[Commitment ordering]]. Tag should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/94.230.86.34|94.230.86.34]] ([[User talk:94.230.86.34|talk]]) 05:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||