Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:21, 14 December 2011

Revision as of 17:31, 1 January 2012

Line 19:

Wikipedia is great for beeing _SIMPLE_ not for beeing "feature rich". This article evaluates C# as better, because it has more features, than Java. The "missing" features of Java are marked red. Diplomatically speaking, this approach is not very clever. [[Special:Contributions/193.165.212.242|193.165.212.242]] ([[User talk:193.165.212.242|talk]]) 11:54, 14 November 2011 (UTC) ([[:cs:User:Pteryx]])

The tone of the article makes it seem heavily biased towards C# because it has features that Java doesn't - ignoring whether Java would actually benefit from these features or not, and the fact that the vast majority of them were deliberately left out because of design principles of the language. Then lo and behold when a feature comes along that's in Java and NOT in C# (checked exceptions for instance) the article launches straight into talking about all the disadvantages of checked exceptions! And when the opposite happens, such as with LINQ, the article discusses all the positives about it.

This article has the potential to be good, however at the moment it's nothing more than a load of biased waffle. I use both C# and Java extensively and have no bias towards one or the other, but this page definitely does. [[Special:Contributions/86.26.141.146|86.26.141.146]] ([[User talk:86.26.141.146|talk]]) 17:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

== Value types ==