Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m fix markup |
→Formula One (programming language): changed to delete |
||
Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
*'''Delete''' <s>'''Redirect''' to [[Constraint logic programming]] because</s> the language's website says the syntax is based on Trilogy, and Trilogy is mentioned in an article in BYTE called "Constraint logic programming" (Feb 1995). I can't find any evidence of notability for F1, even on its own website. --[[User:Northernhenge|Northernhenge]] ([[User talk:Northernhenge|talk]]) 20:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
**Per [[WP:R#PLA]] we should not redirect to an article unless the redirected term is mentioned on the target article in a prominent way. That is not the case now, and merging the content to there may give this [[WP:UNDUE]] weight – no other constraint logic PLs are mentioned there. In spite of the positive review in ''BYTE'' we also have no article on Trilogy (I haven't read the ''BYTE'' review, but I assume this is about the language and system developed by Paul J. Voda). --[[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 22:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
**Yes, I should have re-read [[WP:R#PLA]]. Changed to '''delete'''. --[[User:Northernhenge|Northernhenge]] ([[User talk:Northernhenge|talk]]) 09:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
| |||