Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 19:
* '''snow keep''' Tagged for AfD in under a day of creation - this simply fails [[WP:BITE]]. I'm sure that msnicki will be happy to watch the development of this brand new article, that's if we haven't driven off yet another new wiki editor. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 13:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
::Neither [[WP:SNOW]] nor [[WP:BITE]] seems to support you. With 3 of us !voting to delete and only you in favor of keep, it appears the only way to claim this is [[WP:SNOW]] situation is if you don't know what that means. And [[WP:BITE]] says nothing about keeping new articles just because they were written by new editors. Further, anyone who's done new page patrol knows we delete new articles by new editors constantly, often within minutes of creation. The test isn't whether the article or the editor is new or even whether the article in its present form is acceptable, it's whether the topic is notable. If the sources exist, even if they're not yet cited, we keep it. In this case, I don't think the sources exist. But you could prove me wrong with a citation and if you do, I will change my position, as I do routinely when new information is presented. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 17:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
| |||