* '''snow keep''' Tagged for AfD in under a day of creation - this simply fails [[WP:BITE]]. I'm sure that msnicki will be happy to watch the development of this brand new article, that's if we haven't driven off yet another new wiki editor. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 13:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
::Neither [[WP:SNOW]] nor [[WP:BITE]] seems to support you. With 3 of us !voting to delete and only you in favor of keep, it appears the only way to claim this isfails [[WP:SNOW]] situation is if you don't know what that means. And [[WP:BITE]] says nothing about keeping new articles just because they were written by new editors., though Further,I anyoneconcede whothere's donesome newdiscussion of this at [[WP:NPP#Be nice to the newbies|New page patrol]], knowsbut wethis deleteis newmostly articlesin bythe newcontext editorsof speedy constantlydeletions, oftenespecially withinof minutespages oflacking context or creationcontent. TheThis testis an AfD. It isndoesn't whethermatter who wrote the article or thewhy editorthey isdid newit. orevenContent whetherdoesn't thematter articlebecause inthat itscan presentalways formbe isfixed. acceptable,it'sAll that matters here is whether the topic is notable. If the sources exist, even if they're not yet cited, it's notable and we keep it. In this case, I don't think the sources exist. But you could prove me wrong with a citation and if you do, I will change my position, as I do routinely when new information is presented. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 17:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
