Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 18:
:I've reworked the litigation section a fair bit, and I think it's now neutral and more readable. Nowa, I was perhaps a bit merciless in editting your reexam bit, but I do think it fits far better in the NTP article (I've moved it there) - particularly since now the case is settled, it is, as you say, very unlikely to affect RIM. [[User:kcordina|Kcordina]] <sup> [[User talk:Kcordina|Talk]] </sup> 08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
::Kcordina, No problem. I like what you've done.--[[User:Nowa|Nowa]] 17:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
==Neutrality Concerns==
I have to say, having just read this and the [[NTP Inc.]] articles, I'm worried about some possible neutrality issues. While I know the obvious reply is "fix it yourself", I think I ought to mention it to everyone else too. Between the raving of how RIM invented the Blackberry which was a "great product" and "killer app", and description of NTP as a "patent troll" with no qualification, perhaps we're taking an excessively pro-RIM approach here? [[User:Plasma|Plasma]] 10:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
| |||