Recency principle: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:25, 24 January 2012

Revision as of 19:53, 4 February 2012

Line 2:

{{Wikify|date=April 2010}}

The '''Recency Principle''' is described by the [[Roger Shuy]] in the journal [[Language Log]] [.<ref>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002928.html].</ref>

It is used by police interrogators to have a subject incriminate himself without realizing it, and more importantly, without speaking further about the topic. It exploits a known phenomenon where people focus on the most recent topic.<ref name="Leonard2002">{{cite book|author=David C. Leonard|title=Learning theories, A to Z|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=HBZMrbPyy74C&pg=PA160|accessdate=4 February 2012|year=2002|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-1-57356-413-7|page=160}}</ref> By quickly shifting to an unrelated topic after something incriminating was said, the interrogator can avoid having elaboration to elaborate on the statement, and to avoid protest from the subject.

It is noted that politicians are also aware of this technique. By creating a new topic of debate, focus can be shifted from a more incriminating one.

Line 10:

==See also==

*[[Primacy principle]]

*[[Serial position effect]]

==References==

{{reflist}}

[[Category:Cognitive biases]]