Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:33, 13 February 2012

Revision as of 12:39, 16 February 2012

Line 27:

::<font face="Lucida Console">'''Article.biased() == false;'''</font> C# is simply a newer language than Java and thus has more features because the C# programmers thought of stuff that the Java guys didn't. But that doesn't make it better. How it's ''used'' is important as well. Cheers, [[User talk:68.173.113.106|The Doctahedron]], 00:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

:I use both Java and C#. I prefer C# solely for its support of events. Now I've seen events in old pascal code, so they aren't exactly a new concept - I know that this is just one example of a feature that Java is missing, but is it really that biased to point it out? After all, C# support on mobile phones is inexistent in most cases, and poor on Android - is there any free C# compiler for Android? This "missing feature" for C# is also pointed out in the article, along with arbitrary-length floats. Yes, Java has a lot of red boxes in that list, but that doesn't mean that the list is biased - just that Java has less features than C#. We could compare C# and Java to x86 assembly, and assembly would be almost a solid pane of red boxes - but this doesn't mean that it is worse or inferior, just that it is intended for a different purpose. [[Special:Contributions/90.194.203.69|90.194.203.69]] ([[User talk:90.194.203.69|talk]]) 12:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== Value types ==