Revision as of 20:35, 29 February 2012 edit 213.89.219.79 (talk) →Is "complex" Hilbert space necessary? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:36, 29 February 2012 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,845 edits m Signing comment by 213.89.219.79 - "→Is "complex" Hilbert space necessary?: " Next edit →
Line 11: :Okay, I see that one would need to require the real dimension to be > 2, since otherwise a rotation in the plane has no non-trivial invariant subspace. Which is like in the complex case, where the complex dimension is required to be > 1. But other than that?[[User:Daqu\|Daqu]] ([[User talk:Daqu\|talk]]) 18:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC) . <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.89.219.79\|213.89.219.79]] ([[User talk:213.89.219.79\|talk]]) 20:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> . == after having seen ==

Talk:Invariant subspace problem: Difference between revisions