Talk:Handkerchief code: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:41, 28 March 2012

Revision as of 22:52, 28 March 2012

Line 62:

::: I was concerned that practices such as "experiences intense sexual pleasure by having their face or eyeball licked by the top" seem so unusual as to be a joke. A quality reliable source would be needed for any such odd sexual practice, or we run the risk of people adding "enjoys watching people eat gherkins" and then spending six months talking about it before anyone is bold enough to delete it as rubbish. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 18:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

:Agree with RobinHood on this one. Anything that is not backed up with a reliable source goes. WP policy is quite clear on that. The websites and cards handed out at shops are clearly not reliable sources. Anything sourced solely to them goes. As for Leatherboy Handbook, I personally wouldn't consider it a reliable source, but am willing to let material sourced with it in pending further discussion. Granted, it is far superior to the websites and the cards, but I'd like to see some evidence that its authority on this subject matter is widely recognized outside of the BDSM community. [[User:Dominus Vobisdu|Dominus Vobisdu]] ([[User talk:Dominus Vobisdu|talk]]) 22:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)