Content deleted Content added
→Quantum lambda calculi extensions?: new section |
→Merger proposal: mooted by PROD |
||
Line 13:
== Merger proposal ==
{{Discussion top|1=The result was '''Made moot by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Quantum+virtual+machine&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1 deletion] of [[Quantum virtual machine]] as expired [[WP:PROD|PROD]]''' -- [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 02:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)}}
I suggest we merge [[Quantum virtual machine]] with this article. QVM doesn't seem important enough to have a separate article. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK|talk]]) 22:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure [[Quantum virtual machine]] is important enough to have an article at all. The current article is a 2-sentence stub that states the obvious. I don't think [[Quantum virtual machine]]s thematically fit well with quantum programming languages, because the latter are about programming an actual (if hypothetical) quantum computer, and not about doing simulations. [[User:Selinger|Selinger]] ([[User talk:Selinger|talk]]) 06:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}
== Error? ==
|