Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:16, 12 May 2012

Revision as of 05:50, 12 May 2012

Line 22:

# '''Endorse'''. While I see the (potential) benefits of this proposal there are, in its current form, too many open ends with some important concerns (reviewers, when to use PC) that do not seem adequately addressed. --[[User:Wolbo|Wolbo]] ([[User talk:Wolbo|talk]]) 21:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

# '''Endorse'''. The suggested changes to Wikipedia conflict with the entire principal of the encyclopedia. Furthermore, as these policies are they will make Wikipedia even ''more'' complicated and will create a larger gap between the general userbase and the admins. It would be nice to have a review-type process for oft-vandalized articles, however; I get very tired of reverting articles like [[The Legend of Zelda]]. [[User:Chevsapher|Chevsapher]] ([[User talk:Chevsapher|talk]]) 01:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

#'''Comment''': I originally supported the idea (see #200 above <s>"Support with caveat — I think, overall, it's a good thing, however, those in Position 3 have exceptionally valid points that still need to be addressed, e.g., users Tryptofish and Wizardman</s>"), but after continuing to read comments and having a further think on it, I un!voted, striking my response. I believe the problems it will introduce without addressing the points made in this section will create a wikiwar, if not several. I still think it's a good idea, but the demons are all in details that haven't yet been addressed: it needs more baking time as it's still not cooked. &mdash; [[User:Sctechlaw|Sctechlaw]] ([[User talk:Sctechlaw|talk]]) 05:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]