Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by NJ Wine - "→Position #1: Endorse" |
→Position #1: endorse |
||
Line 174:
# '''Endorse''' Keep it as it is. The negative effect of a structural hierarchy of reviewers destroys the ethos of the project. It becomes edited by a few instead of edited by all.[[User:Davdevalle|Davdevalle]] ([[User talk:Davdevalle|talk]]) 14:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
# '''Endorse''' Pending changes is ideologically wrong for Wikipedia. It means that the vast majority of editors will be restricted from editting sensitive articles (e.g., BLP). Wikipedia has become the lead online encyclopedia because of its open structure. Unless we've decided that it's time for Wikipedia to stop growing, and instead enter a maintenance phase, PC must be rejected. NJ Wine 21:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NJ Wine|NJ Wine]] ([[User talk:NJ Wine|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NJ Wine|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
# The pending changes system may look OK in theory, but the trial period convinced me that we are better off without it. --[[User:Zundark|Zundark]] ([[User talk:Zundark|talk]]) 21:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
| |||