Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections July 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Moving down Lir's statement; candidates are listed according to the order in which they announced |
|||
Line 83:
I have submitted evidence in 3 arbitration cases, and been a party to one. I believe this gives me good insight into how the process has worked (largely, very well) and into how it feels to be on the other side of the coin. I hope to propose ideas that will help the AC continue to develop a wise and fair system. I like the idea of mediation and hope to support increased dialogue between MC and AC. And lastly, while I aim to take care in making decisions to ensure I am not being rash or hasty, I also hope to improve the speed of the AC by voting more quickly, especially on cases that are fairly clear. I have edited here since July 2003, been an administrator since September 2003, and was made a bureaucrat last month. I would appreciate your vote, and will not hold it against anyone who prefers one of the other excellent candidates for this post. [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 18:08, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
==[[User:Lir]]==▼
I am strongly opposed to sysop abuses; we need non-sysops on the arbitration committee. [[User:Lir|Lirath Q. Pynnor]]▼
== [[User:Misterrick|Misterrick]] ==
Line 107 ⟶ 103:
Let it be known that I have '''no''' animosity toward any of my opponents. I welcome any of their questions on [[User talk:Merovingian|my talk page]]. [[User:Merovingian|<font color="green">Merovingian]]</font><big>✍</big>[[User talk:Merovingian|<font color="orange">Talk]] 11:06, Jul 31, 2004 (UTC)
▲==[[User:Lir]]==
▲I am strongly opposed to sysop abuses; we need non-sysops on the arbitration committee. [[User:Lir|Lirath Q. Pynnor]]
| |||