Musical syntax: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
4 unspaced hyphens —> 4 spaced en dashesWP:ENDASH, part 4
1 unspaced hyphen —> 1 spaced en dashWP:ENDASH, part 4
Line 100:
Violating an anticipated structure in music could mean a harmonically unexpected note or chord in a musical sequence. As in language this is associated with a “processing cost due to the tonal distance” (Patel, 2008) and therefore means that more resources are needed for activating low-activation items.
 
====SSIRH-the leading concept====
Overall these theories lead to the “shared syntactic integration resources hypothesis” as the areas from which low-activation items are activated could be the correlate to the overlap between linguistic and musical syntax.
Strong evidence for the existence of this overlap comes from studies, in which music-syntactic and a linguistic-syntactic irregularities were presented simultaneously. They showed an interaction between the ERAN and the [[LAN]] (left anterior negativity;ERP which is elicited by linguistic-syntactic irregularities). The LAN elicited was reduced when an irregular word was presented simultaneously with an irregular chord compared to the condition when an irregular word was presented with a regular chord. Contrary to this finding the phMMN elicited by frequency deviants did not interact with the LAN.